Visit MPB Visit MPB Visit MPB

How many people actually need weather sealing?

This topic has a poll - login to enter
gartmore
Posted 14/02/2014 - 12:23 Link
K10D wrote:
gartmore wrote:
Not at all important to me because I've been using cameras in the rain for four decades without any mishaps.

and I had you down as a youngster.

Best regards

thanks! I have a younger wife, that'll be the reason
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
gwing
Posted 14/02/2014 - 12:52 Link
Nice to have, but not actually all that useful as none of my best lenses are WR.
gartmore
Posted 14/02/2014 - 13:07 Link
I really wonder at the necessity of the lens to body gasket/O ring, if it is light tight surely it is WR?
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
RalphHardwick
Posted 14/02/2014 - 13:36 Link
On my last trip to the desert I had an Olympus E-520. After a few days the pop up flash, popped up and wouldn't go down due to sand in the mechanism and I had a lovely grinding sound each time I zoomed in or out on 2 of my lenses .

The replacement had to be dust sealed.

Rain in Britain is just one consideration for me, dust and temperature resistance are also key.

I recently, happily stood and took some pictures of a big Norwegian waterfall when others hid from the spray. A quick wipe of the lens and body afterwards and all was good in the world

My Canon wielding travel companions stood here:
Comment Image


Whilst I also stood on the small balcony, you can see on the left, and took this:
Comment Image


Okay, Okay, it's not an award winning, but it made me feel good at the time
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CaptureLight Ltd
flickr
"I carry a camera to capture memories and the occasional photograph worthy of sharing"
Smeggypants
Posted 14/02/2014 - 13:42 Link
gartmore wrote:
K10D wrote:
Quote:
Not at all important to me because I've been using cameras in the rain for four decades without any mishaps.

and I had you down as a youngster.

Best regards

thanks! I have a younger wife, that'll be the reason

Having a partner that is 10 years younger is OK at 50, but not so acceptable when you're 20
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
gwing
Posted 14/02/2014 - 13:56 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
gartmore wrote:
Quote:
gartmore wrote:
Not at all important to me because I've been using cameras in the rain for four decades without any mishaps.

and I had you down as a youngster.

Best regards

thanks! I have a younger wife, that'll be the reason

Having a partner that is 10 years younger is OK at 50, but not so acceptable when you're 20



I was tempted to write a very un-PC comment here about even younger ages but will forbear
gartmore
Posted 14/02/2014 - 13:59 Link
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
petrochemist
Posted 14/02/2014 - 16:54 Link
I've only got one camera/lens combination thats weather sealed. If it's wet That'll normally be the one I use. Even if I really want 10x the focal length.

Not vitally important to me as most of my cameras/lenses aren't sealed, but it's certainly good to have the option to ignore the weather. I'd certainly rather a few more of mine were WR, but I have to limit costs and cant afford to upgrade perfectly good gear just for WR.
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.

.[size=11:].FlickrWPFPanoramio
bwlchmawr
Posted 14/02/2014 - 17:08 Link
I'd take the claims about weather sealing with a pinch of salt and certainly wouldn't trust it in a downpour. The viewfinders in both my K10 and K5 are full of dust and the latter has large bits of grit behind the memory card door. And I am very careful how I treat them.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Blythman
Posted 14/02/2014 - 18:02 Link
I've got first hand experience of my K3 and 12-24 failing. Swapped to the 18-135 and all was good again.

The 12-24 spent a few days in the airing cupboard with rice, and all is good
Alan


PPG
Flickr
cabstar
Posted 14/02/2014 - 18:34 Link
As well as the DA* lenses I also use one of these if I am on the rain all day

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000PTFDYO/ref=oh_details_o04_s00_i00?ie=UTF8...

Extra insurance policy
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Posted 14/02/2014 - 18:35 Link
Very much so, Cumbria kinda covers it really, was fed up with the amount of times my previous stayed in the bag, if only I had realised how much I was going to enjoy getting back into photography I would've extended my budget the first time and been very happy with the K5 back then.
Pint o' rough & a game o' darts anyone
jeffstclair
Posted 14/02/2014 - 20:15 Link
I live in a country made of dust held together with grit .. if ever I am able to up grade from the K100 I will go for a weatherproof DSLR ..... jeff....
Edited by jeffstclair: 14/02/2014 - 20:18
davidstorm
Posted 14/02/2014 - 20:46 Link
gartmore wrote:
I really wonder at the necessity of the lens to body gasket/O ring, if it is light tight surely it is WR?

Not so Ken, the lens to body join is the most likely place for water to get in. I've had this happen several times when out in the rain, it is surprising how much water gets into this join, so the O ring here is a fundamental requirement for proper weather-sealing.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
Posted 14/02/2014 - 22:12 Link
Given the weather in the UK at the moment and the "summer" we had in 2012, I think Full weather sealing on both bodies and lenses should be compulsory by law, otherwise we would never take photos.....
Some Cameras

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.