FS: Loads of stuff (holiday edition)


HarisF1

Link Posted 28/05/2018 - 13:52
It’s that time of year again where I realise I’ve spent too much money on lenses and need to thin my collection somewhat (and dipping into my daily use lenses now too). This time it’s a bit more forced due to an interesting trip coming up later in the year. Here’s what I have to offer:


Macro-Takumar 50mm f/4 - £100
Auto Takumar 35mm f/2.3 - £220
S-M-C Takumar 20mm f/4 - £200
S-M-C Takumar 24mm f/3.5 - £140
Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5 - £55
S-M-C Takumar 50mm f/1.4 - £75
S-M-C Takumar 105mm f/2.8 - £80
S-M-C Takumar 200mm f/4 - £55

Pentax K 24mm f/2.8 - £110
Pentax K 28mm SHIFT - £290
Pentax K 30mm f/2.8 - £215
Pentax K 50mm f/1.4 - £75
Pentax K 135mm f/2.5 - £125
Pentax K 135mm f/2.5 - £125

Pentax M 50mm f/1.7 - £30
Pentax M 120mm f/2.8 - £90

Pentax A 50mm f/1.7 - £35
Pentax A* 135mm f/1.8 - £1600

Pentax F 50mm f/1.7 - £95
Pentax F 17-28mm Fisheye - £250

Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4 - £150
Pentax FA 77mm f/1.8 - £590
Pentax FA* 85mm f/1.4 - £800

Pentax SMC DA 15mm f/4.0 - £240
Pentax DA 17-70mm f/4.0 - £160
Pentax DA 70mm f/2.4 - £175

Pentax Q 01 Lens - £80
Pentax Q 02 Lens - £60
Pentax Q 06 Lens - £95

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro - £130
Samyang 135mm f/2.0 - £370
Samyang 24mm f/3.5 TS - £380

Pentax KP (Silver) with 199 shots - £580
Pentax K-x for parts (underexposes images, broken flash and hotshoe) - £30
Pentax Q10 - £80

Prices quoted without postage, all items in good condition or better, PM or comment for more details. As a last point, if I message you about buying your stuff, do me a favour and say no - until after November

JohnX

Link Posted 28/05/2018 - 14:42
I have an interest in the 28mm shift, mainly, to be honest, because I don't have one, so real LBA!

How does if perform on APSC please? I read somewhere that it really needs to be on a FF body.

HarisF1

Link Posted 28/05/2018 - 15:12
I would have thought the 28mm might be a bit long for the shift effect to work but it's pretty cool - here are a couple of hastily snapped shots at f/8, 1/200. In the shifted shot, some CA is visible. You won't get the same width as on FF but step back and you can get a very useful effect. Considering this is a full frame lens, you can probably also benefit from the 'Composition Adjust' feature to get additional shift in your images.

Unshifted:



Shifted down fully:

JohnX

Link Posted 28/05/2018 - 20:15
Thanks Haris.

theonenadeem

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 03:12
Haris.

What condition is the super tak 50 1.4 in and does it come with the original caps.
What colour is the 77mm1.8 and the da70mm f2.4. and what is the condition.

Since you always have good Pentax gear to sell, may I have your ebay id.

Regards

womble

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 07:47
JohnX wrote:
I have an interest in the 28mm shift, mainly, to be honest, because I don't have one, so real LBA!

How does if perform on APSC please? I read somewhere that it really needs to be on a FF body.

It works really well. Obviously, on a full frame body you can be closer to your subject but if there is space it can be excellent. I use it in churches and cathedrals all the time. Additionally, if you do not have enough space, you can always take two images, one shifted and one not, and stitch them. Because of the shift, the stitching will be perfect every time.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.

My website
Last Edited by womble on 29/05/2018 - 07:47

JohnX

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 08:11
womble wrote:
JohnX wrote:
I have an interest in the 28mm shift, mainly, to be honest, because I don't have one, so real LBA!

How does if perform on APSC please? I read somewhere that it really needs to be on a FF body.

It works really well. Obviously, on a full frame body you can be closer to your subject but if there is space it can be excellent. I use it in churches and cathedrals all the time. Additionally, if you do not have enough space, you can always take two images, one shifted and one not, and stitch them. Because of the shift, the stitching will be perfect every time.

Thanks.

womble

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 08:34
I could blow the next six months wages on that lot!
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.

My website

womble

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 08:42
Is the macro Takumar the sort that extends front and back when focused, with preset aperture at the front?

Thanks, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.

My website

HarisF1

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 11:22
womble wrote:
Is the macro Takumar the sort that extends front and back when focused, with preset aperture at the front?

Thanks, Kris.

Hi mate, this is the original preset version and from what I've seen it extends a bit more than the Super/SMC versions to get 1:1 magnification.

JAK

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 13:49
Can I ask what you didn't like about the KP to move it on again so soon?
John K

HarisF1

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 14:34
The colour. I got the silver one since my brother preferred my black KP, but realised pretty soon that it's a bit too bold for me. I don't have many silver lenses either. I'm buying a 2nd hand black version to replace it.

It still doesn't get as much use as the K-1 but I still want to keep one since the kit is more manageable (DA15, 40XS, 18-135 and maybe one of 77/70). If the black one I bought turns out to be in poor condition, I might return it in which case the silver one stays.

JAK

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 16:26
Thanks. Having come from the era of silver bodies (ME, MX, KII etc.) that's not something I'd have ever considered. Basically street cred then !
John K

HarisF1

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 16:38
JAK wrote:
Thanks. Having come from the era of silver bodies (ME, MX, KII etc.) that's not something I'd have ever considered. Basically street cred then !

Good point about those old bodies - the silver paint on the newer bodies just isn't the same as the original metal (aluminium?) so even though they may look nice they feel a bit tacky for my liking. The same finish in black just feels nicer to me even though it sounds strange.

womble

Link Posted 29/05/2018 - 17:14
The one on the left in the picture shown here?
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.

My website
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.