Dark image
Posted 19/02/2010 - 09:35
Link
In camera you should have taken a exposure reading from within the bar. However, if you do that the street will be completely washed out.
This looks like a perfect example for HDR. If you shot RAW then increase exposure +1 +2 etc and combine the files in HDR.
Good luck
This looks like a perfect example for HDR. If you shot RAW then increase exposure +1 +2 etc and combine the files in HDR.
Good luck
Posted 19/02/2010 - 09:49
Link
Use a flashgun (the pop-up flash won't be powerful enough), or alternatively a longer exposure if you don't mind blowing the street view.
With an automatic or semi-auto exposure mode, set the camera's metering mode to centre-weighted and point it at a part of the interior (without the street being visible in the frame) and press the AE-L button, then recompose. Or alternatively add some +EV Compensation.
A high ISO setting will be required if not using flash or tripod.
You can also adjust the brightness of the dark areas to some extent on your computer afterwards. There is more scope to do this with a RAW source.
With an automatic or semi-auto exposure mode, set the camera's metering mode to centre-weighted and point it at a part of the interior (without the street being visible in the frame) and press the AE-L button, then recompose. Or alternatively add some +EV Compensation.
A high ISO setting will be required if not using flash or tripod.
You can also adjust the brightness of the dark areas to some extent on your computer afterwards. There is more scope to do this with a RAW source.
~Pete
Posted 19/02/2010 - 09:53
Link
Posted 19/02/2010 - 10:11
Link
Thanks guys... have already looked up the solution on an interior photography website, where all of the above was suggested. I do have RAW files for all of the images, so bit of experimentation, I guess?
I also acquired a METZ flashgun, so perhaps another trip with all the extra gear might also be the solution. Also an opportunity to take some more pics. Fortunately, the venue is only 10 minutes walk from my home..
I also acquired a METZ flashgun, so perhaps another trip with all the extra gear might also be the solution. Also an opportunity to take some more pics. Fortunately, the venue is only 10 minutes walk from my home..
Posted 19/02/2010 - 10:12
Link
karlh wrote:
Took the attached image from within a bar, towards the street. What should I have done to make the image lighter, anyone, please...
[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r175/hammie_friend/KH__5781.jpg[/IMG]
Your image is quite small but it looks pretty good to me?! The bar was that dark in real life, right?
Took the attached image from within a bar, towards the street. What should I have done to make the image lighter, anyone, please...
[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r175/hammie_friend/KH__5781.jpg[/IMG]
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 19/02/2010 - 10:32
Link
I bet it didn't appear THAT dark in real life due to the way the human eye and brain deals with low light and high dynamic range better than any camera can.
~Pete
Posted 19/02/2010 - 14:24
Link
The bright light from the windows has persuaded the camera meter that the area as a whole is brighter than it is, so it has cut down the exposure accordingly. Hence the under-exposure of the foreground.
I suspect the inside was your subject, not what was outside the windows, so to render it correctly you could either recompose to ensure that window light was not a major influenece on the metering, or you could apply +1 or even +2 stops of exposure compensation, which will adjust the meter reading.
The image as you have it might have enough detail in the dark areas to retrieve using Photoshop, but quality may suffer.
The possibility of adding a bit of flash exposure has already been mentioned.
I suspect the inside was your subject, not what was outside the windows, so to render it correctly you could either recompose to ensure that window light was not a major influenece on the metering, or you could apply +1 or even +2 stops of exposure compensation, which will adjust the meter reading.
The image as you have it might have enough detail in the dark areas to retrieve using Photoshop, but quality may suffer.
The possibility of adding a bit of flash exposure has already been mentioned.
Best regards, John
Posted 19/02/2010 - 20:19
Link
I have used the RAW file, altered the sensitivity and rotated it, so that it was vertical. It was and is like as is...
thanks for all the comments..
[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r175/hammie_friend/KH__5781_side.jpg[/IMG]
thanks for all the comments..
[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r175/hammie_friend/KH__5781_side.jpg[/IMG]
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



77 posts
17 years
Notting Hill,
London
[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r175/hammie_friend/KH__5781.jpg[/IMG]