Can anyone advise as to the quality of these two lenses please


petemasty

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 20:25
I've come into the possession of two m42 mount primes lenses. Cant fit them to my camera without an adapter so can't really compare them to my Pentax A 50mm 1.7. so was wondering if anyone out there can give me some info, feedback or other such knowledge on these two lenses. They are:

-Helio-44M 2/58 (f2)

-Auto Rikenon 50mm f2

Your help is greatly appreciated.
Pete M
My Flickr

Pentaxophile

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 20:36
Can only comment on the Helios, which I have in K-mount. I haven't done a direct comparison to my 50mm f1.7, but it is a nice lens with extremely characterful 'swirly' bokeh.






[link=https://500px.com/will_brealey/[/link]

Transit

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 20:38
Helio
there...I like the first guys comment cheap, sharp, cheap
K-1 K-01 Q-7
some len

Close to the Edge
Down by the River
Last Edited by Transit on 29/11/2011 - 20:39

petemasty

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 20:45
Just had a look on Flickr for Helios pics and I gotta say they give a very unique bokeh.
Pete M
My Flickr

Algernon

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 20:58
The Rikenon is rare in M42. It should be sharp, probably
similar to the Yashicas and could well be made by Tomioka.

Helios lenses do vary, but about 1 in 4 is usually very
good.
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi

petemasty

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 21:09
Algernon wrote:
The Rikenon is rare in M42. It should be sharp, probably
similar to the Yashicas and could well be made by Tomioka.

Helios lenses do vary, but about 1 in 4 is usually very
good.

does 'rare' equate to worth a lot? Please let it be true!!!
Pete M
My Flickr

sorted78

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 21:16
Quote:
does 'rare' equate to worth a lot?

Probably not, unfortunately. It should be a nice lens, though. I've got a Chinon 55/1.4 that is also Tomioka-made and it's pretty good. The bokeh I get with it is different to the Pentax and Helios.

Definitely worth getting an M42 adapter to have a play, anyway.

Algernon

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 21:35
petemasty wrote:
Algernon wrote:
The Rikenon is rare in M42. It should be sharp, probably
similar to the Yashicas and could well be made by Tomioka.

Helios lenses do vary, but about 1 in 4 is usually very
good.

does 'rare' equate to worth a lot? Please let it be true!!!

Is 10 to 30 a lot

The Chinon 55mm f/1.4 is an awesome lens usually
goes for around 65 which is cheap for the super
bokeh that it has. I have the f/1.4 and f/1.2 versions.
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Last Edited by Algernon on 29/11/2011 - 21:40

petemasty

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 21:41
Algernon

i was sort of hoping that the Rikenon was worth somewhere in the region of 3, million. Y'know, a bit like that photo of the River Rhine that sold recently.

That said, I'm always happy to accept an offer in the millions for this lens. I'm sure its a work of art. I'll even go and get an adapter and lens covers and throw them in for free.

Just order an adapter, so i can have a play and do some comparisons. with my Pentax A and M 50mm f1.7s.
Pete M
My Flickr

petemasty

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 21:42
I paid 33 for the two lenses and a Pentax A 50mm f1.7, so i think i got a bit of a bargain with that little lot.
Pete M
My Flickr

Mike-P

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 21:54
The 50mm is worth twice that on it's own so I would say you did ok
No equipment list here but thanks for taking an interest. My Flickr

petemasty

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 21:55
Woo-hoo!! Back of the net!!!!!!!!!!

I may even kiss the wife!!
Pete M
My Flickr

Algernon

Link Posted 29/11/2011 - 22:02
It's mostly the bokeh that's different, although the Pentax
lenses have good bokeh wide open as well.

I doubt if you will notice much difference in sharpness.
The Pentax lenses should just edge it.

This is a good site for bokeh samples link
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Last Edited by Algernon on 29/11/2011 - 22:05

beachboy2

Link Posted 30/11/2011 - 08:16
I have the Helios 44M with M42 mount. It's probably my favourite lens for taking orchid photos.cheers
bb2



K5, K20D, Bigma, Sigma EX 105, Sigma EX 10-20, Sigma EX 28-70 F2.8, Sigma Ex 1.4TC,
Pentax 135 F3.5, Pentax 30mm F2.8 , Pentax 50mm F1.7, Pentax 55mm F1.8,
Super Taks: 35mm F3.5, 50mm F1.4, 135mm F3.5, 200mm F4
Vivitar TX 200mm F3.5,Vivitar (Komine)135mm f2.8, Vivitar 2X TC, Vivitar T4 400mm F6.3
Tamron SP 35-80,80-210 F3.8, Helios 44M, Mir 1B 37mm F2.8, Jupiter 9 85mm F2, Chinon 28mm F2.8, 3M-5A 500mm F8 etc etc
Last Edited by beachboy2 on 30/11/2011 - 08:17

Frogfish

Link Posted 30/11/2011 - 15:16
I have a Helios 44M (M42 mount) and as has been stated a lovely, different, bokeh .. which is why most people buy it (and it's quite sharp too). A keeper.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.