Adapter advice.
Roger
Just passing thru
Here's my take on this.
If you look at the K mount lens the red dot on the mount is aligned with the focus red line on the lens body.

My experience is that there is an advantage with paying for a genuine Pentax adapter as then the aperture and focus points on an attached lens line up correctly with the camera body i.e. they are at the 12 o'clock position. Here's an example using a genuine Pentax adapter with M42 lens, a Helios 44-2, showing the red dot and that it aligns correctly.





With a cheaper cloned adapter they fit but the lens no longer lines up at the 12 o'clock position. You can tell whether the alignment is correct as the adpaters have a red dot on them. When the Pentax made adapter is fitted to the M42 lens the red dot on the adapter aligns with the lens' red focus position mark. With a clone copy adapter these re marks don't align. Again using the Helios 44-2 lens now with the cloned adapter.
Note I have removed this adapter's spring locking tab.



Things get more complicated when using a M39 lens, I have an Industar-50 lens with a M39 mount. To use this lens I have to fit a M39 to M42 adapter (non Pentax) and my genuine M42 to Pentax K adapter. Using this combination the lens and adapters can now be fitted to the camera but does not align correctly. I don't know if a genuine Pentax M39 to M42 adapter is available, but if this exists perhaps the lens would have aligned correctly.




A couple of notes:
I have had adapters get very tightly attached to the lens, if this happens fit a lens cap on to the adapter and rotate it anticlockwise to release the adapter from the lens body.
Also I have tried another cloned M42 - PK adapters and again this did not align correctly but the misalignment was not the same.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Mike
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Some M42 mounts - like Tamron twin tele, Meyer 135 and 200mm, Tair 300mm do not snug up to the camera when screwed on and they leave a tiny gap where the two slots on the adapter will admit light. It doesn't always happen but when it does it can be very hard to diagnose the problem. Once you realise where the light is getting in a tiny bit of tape cures it instantly.
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass
My page on Photocrowd - link
Just passing thru
As along as the adapter is tightly screwed onto the lens you'll have no problems using it like any manual K mount lens.
I've also had the genuine adapter but it's a bit of a faff getting it on and off while still using K mount lenses compared to keeping a few adapters ready to 'convert' lenses.
All the gear with no idea
Just passing thru
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass
My page on Photocrowd - link
It can be done but sooner or later you will remove the lens and the adapter will stay in the camera. It can be more trouble than you might expect. Once you get used to it you will almost certainly get more lenses from E bay - M42s are not expensive and it's fun to try them out.
It's actually easier to remove the adapter from the camera body if the little metal spring plate has been removed which will be necessary to do if the adapter is to be permanently fixed to the lens. The big caveat is that if using a lens with a stiff focus ring (a common downside found on vintage M42 lenses) then one can if not careful, unwittingly dismount the lens from the the camera whilst focussing, so care is needed. That aside, the purchase and enjoyment to be found in using a vintage M42 lens can lead to a long term addiction. You have been warned!

C.O.L.B.A.S victim
(Compulsive Obsessive Lens Buying Addiction Syndrome)
What you need are lenses, more lenses, bigger lenses, better lenses, faster lenses, vintage lenses and when you have these, your pictures will be perfect!
Just passing thru
Be well, stay safe.
Just passing thru
takuman
Member
Just passing thru