A Question about the Q
The content will be much more important.
Check out ones photographs on Flickr!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/awprentice/
Michael
Part of the sort out was 2x Q bodies that never got used and Fiona suggested that the Q's should be her kit and she hasn't looked back since. She now has a twin body kit and has been buying loads of cheap filters for 99p a pop off of ebay and actually having a lot of fun with her photography now.
We have printed some images from them, no bigger than A4 but they are perfectly fine and you'd never guess which camera they are from, so I say go for it!
Check out ones photographs on Flickr!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/awprentice/
Check out ones photographs on Flickr!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/awprentice/
I do like my Q (for its body) and Q7 (for image quality), especially with the 01, 06, and 08 lenses. Someone should try cross dressing these two cameras (Q7 innards in a Q exoskeleton) - I really don't want to be the first!
Hoping the next incarnation of Q has an electronic viewfinder even if it means using a detachable flash (rather than vice versa).
I am in the hunt for the Q7 or QS1 believe me! And I couldnt agree more about the Q body - its a marvelous piece of engineering. As regards the Q's future it doesnt look likely that it will continue; certainly in its current guise.
Check out ones photographs on Flickr!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/awprentice/
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
1497 posts
13 years
When I was going through blurb books for my projects I thought to myself "surely the Q is of good enough quality to be used in a book?"
Has anyone tried printing big with the wee Q>?
As some have mentioned before the blown out highlights can be a bit of a peev but that is its charm in many respects.
Below is a photo that I took this morning on way for a doc appointment - I think it might be my "project camera" for 2017
Am I mad!?!?
Check out ones photographs on Flickr!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/awprentice/